NJ v. Reid
The case is basically about IP addresses and privacy. Jersey Diesel’s shipping address and password had been changed on the company’s website by an unknown person. The owner suspected that employee Shirley Reid was behind it since he had argued with her on the day that the changes had been made. He went to the police and they sent a subpoena to Comcast, the ISP of the captured IP address. It belonged to Shirley Reid. However, the subpoena was filed under the name of a case that didn’t actually exist. It was sent to the Supreme Court, who found the evidence unlawful since it had been obtained without a proper warrant. The Court ruled that internet users have the right to a certain expectation of privacy.
Privacy is a big deal on the internet, even if we sometimes seem not to notice. Facebook and myspace and whatever other websites that are out there make it seem very open. But probably all of us do stuff on the internet that we wouldn’t want to become public knowledge. In NJ v. Reid, the Court found that not only was the evidence obtained illegally, to do so violated Reid’s right to privacy on the internet. The company owner and the police had demanded information about Reid that only her ISP would normally have access to. Comcast gave them her phone number, address, email address, account number, IP address assigned, the type of service provided, and her method of payment.
Sufficient justification and due legal process play a huge part in this. If anyone could have that information just by asking, how safe would the internet be? I shudder to think. Users should be able to expect that their actions are confidential when in their own homes because they give their information to an ISP in order to use certain technology, not to have their personal information spread around.