http://www.informationweek.com/news/management/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=197003052&pgno=1&queryText=&isPrev=
http://www.murdoch.edu.au/elaw/issues/v10n4/halbert104_text.html#What%20Your%20Software%20License%20Says_C [For this article, scroll down to the section labeled What Your Software License Says]
After a conversation with one of my high school friends this weekend, I decided to do some reading about hacking. As I prefer paper to a screen for reading, I went first to a book my dad gave me, Hack Proofing Your Network. The philosophy of the authors is that learning to hack your own computer can help you secure it against other security violations. The first chapter, however, deals with the politics of hacking, including legal/moral issues and the like. During my reading, I came across some disturbing facts. I decided to do some outside research on shrinkwrap licenses and found these two articles.
I’m all kinds of displeased with what I’ve discovered. It’s hard to believe that we as consumers have let software companies pack so much outrageousness into end-user license agreements (EULAs). As the second article discusses, no other form of information distribution takes so many rights away from the user. We aren’t even buying our software! We’re buying the storage media and renting the right to use the software it contains. Any use other than the manufacturer’s intended one violates the EULA. Worse, we have no ability to negotiate the terms of the agreement. We can either accept the stated terms or go without the product. Which is why nobody reads EULAs in the first place, aside from the fact that they are incredibly boring. There’s just no point to it.
Something should be done about this. Not many companies really care whether users stick to the EULA, under most circumstances. But the fact remains that there is a huge potential for abuse in this system and it needs to be changed.